This article includes a list of references or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (June 2008). Some typical tensile strengths of some materials:
| Material |
Yield strength
(MPa) |
Ultimate strength
(MPa) |
Density
(g/cm³) |
| first carbon nanotube ropes |
? |
3,600 |
1.3 |
| Structural steel ASTM A36 steel |
250 |
400 |
7.8 |
| Steel, API 5L X65 (Fikret Mert Veral) |
448 |
531 |
7.8 |
| Steel, high strength alloy ASTM A514 |
690 |
760 |
7.8 |
| Steel, prestressing strands |
1,650 |
1,860[citation needed] |
7.8 |
| Steel Wire |
|
|
7.8 |
| Steel (AISI 1,060 0.6% carbon) Piano wire |
2,200-2,482[1] |
|
7.8 |
| High density polyethylene (HDPE) |
26-33 |
37 |
0.95 |
| Polypropylene |
12-43 |
19.7-80 |
0.91 |
| Stainless steel AISI 302 - Cold-rolled |
520 |
860 |
|
| Cast iron 4.5% C, ASTM A-48 |
130 |
200 |
|
| Titanium alloy (6% Al, 4% V) |
830 |
900 |
4.51 |
| Aluminium alloy 2014-T6[citation needed] |
400 |
455 |
2.7 |
| Copper 99.9% Cu |
70 |
220 |
8.92 |
| Cupronickel 10% Ni, 1.6% Fe, 1% Mn, balance Cu |
130 |
350 |
8.94 |
| Brass |
200+ |
550 |
5.3 |
| Tungsten |
|
1,510 |
19.25 |
| Glass |
|
50 (in compression) |
2.53 |
| E-Glass |
N/A |
3,450 |
2.57 |
| S-Glass |
N/A |
4,710 |
2.48 |
| Basalt fiber |
N/A |
4,840 |
2.7 |
| Marble |
N/A |
15 |
|
| Concrete |
N/A |
3 |
|
| Carbon Fiber |
N/A |
5,650 |
1.75 |
| Human hair |
|
380 |
|
| Spider silk (See note below) |
|
1,000 |
|
| Silkworm silk |
500 |
|
|
| Aramid (Kevlar or Twaron) |
3,620 |
|
1.44 |
| UHMWPE |
23 |
46 |
0.97 |
| UHMWPE fibers[2][3] (Dyneema or Spectra) |
|
2,300-3,500 |
0.97 |
| Vectran |
|
2,850-3,340 |
|
| Polybenzoxazole (Zylon) |
|
5,800 |
|
| Pine Wood (parallel to grain) |
|
40 |
|
| Bone (limb) |
104-121 |
130 |
1.6 |
| Nylon, type 6/6 |
45 |
75 |
1.15 |
| Rubber |
- |
15 |
|
| Boron |
N/A |
3,100 |
2.46 |
| Silicon, monocrystalline (m-Si) |
N/A |
7,000 |
2.33 |
| Silicon carbide (SiC) |
N/A |
34,40 |
|
| Sapphire (Al2O3) |
N/A |
1,900 |
3.9-4.1 |
| Carbon nanotube (see note below) |
N/A |
62,000 |
1.34 |
| Carbon nanotube composites |
N/A |
1,200[4] |
N/A |
- Note: Multiwalled carbon nanotubes have the highest tensile strength of any material yet measured, with labs producing them at a tensile strength of 63 GPa, still well below their theoretical limit of 300 GPa. The first nanotube ropes (20 mm long) whose tensile strength was published (in 2000) had a strength of 3.6 GPa, still well below their theoretical limit.[5]
- Note: many of the values depend on manufacturing process and purity/composition.
- Note: human hair strength varies by ethnicity and chemical treatments.
- Note on spider silk strength: The strength of spider silk is highly variable. It depends on many factors including type of silk (every spider can produce several different types for different purposes), the particular species, the age of the silk, the temperature, the humidity, the rate that the stress is applied at during testing, the length of time the stress is applied and the way the silk is collected (forced silking or natural spinning)[6]. The value shown in the table, 1000Mpa, is roughly representative of the results from a few studies involving several different species of spider however specific results varied greatly.[7]
| Elements in the annealed state |
Young's Modulus
(GPa) |
Proof or yield stress
(MPa) |
Ultimate strength
(MPa) |
| Aluminium |
70 |
15-20 |
40-50 |
| Copper |
130 |
33 |
210 |
| Gold |
79 |
|
100 |
| Iron |
211 |
80-100 |
350 |
| Lead |
16 |
|
12 |
| Nickel |
170 |
14-35 |
140-195 |
| Silicon |
107 |
5,000-9,000 |
|
| Silver |
83 |
|
170 |
| Tantalum |
186 |
180 |
200 |
| Tin |
47 |
9-14 |
15-200 |
| Titanium |
120 |
100-225 |
240-370 |
| Tungsten |
411 |
550 |
550-620 |
| Zinc (wrought) |
105 |
|
110-200 |
Bend Testing
Typical Yield Strength
Typical Tensile Strength
Compression Testing
Tensile Strength Tesing
Yield Strength Testing
Yield strength & Yield point
Elements in the annealed state
Metallographic Test - Metallography Testing
Metallographic Test Report
Intergranular Corrosion
Intergranular Corrosion of Stainless Steel Tubes
Corrosion Resistant Stainless Steel Tube
Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel Tubes
ASTM A262 Intergranular Corrosion Test IGC
Difference Between Yield Strength and Tensile Strength
ASTM E112 Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size
Stainless Steel Tube Dimension
Stainless Steel Tube Guage
ANSI Standard Pipe Chart
Millimeters Inches Conversion Chart
Stainless Steel Tube Weight Calculation Tool
Conversion Table of Temperatue, Length,Mass,Pressure
NPS-Nominal-Pipe-Size
NPS-Nominal-Pipe-Size and DN - Diametre Nominal
Pipe Schedule
Pressure Ratings for standard seamless stainless steel pipes
Pipe Working Pressure Calculations
Internal Pressure Calculation
Brinell and Rockwell Hardness Conversion Chart
Pipes Tubes Plates Bars Square Tubes Weight Calculation Calculator
Conversion Calculator Calculation-Pressure|Weight|Temperature|Volume|Length
Pipe Working Pressure Calculation
Metals Weight Calculator Calculation
Stainless Steel Pipe Specifications
Stainless Steel Tube Dimension
Stainless Steel Tubes L H Grade
Stainless Steel Properties Description
Stainless Steel Cold Working Properties
304/304L/304LN/304H tubing and pipe
Stainless Steel Pipes Sizes
Stainless Steel-ASTM-Material Grade-Standard
Seawater Resistance of Stainless Steel Tubes
ASTMA312/A213/A269/A511/A376/A789/A790 DIN17456/17458 JIS3459/3463 DNV Chemical Compostion
International Conversion Table For Stainless Steel
Stainless Steel Relative Cost Data
Select Stainless Steel Grade by Characteristics and Usage
Selection of Stainless Steels from Corrosion Resistance, Mechanical Physical Properties
Select Materials for Heat Exchanger Tubes with Substantial Pressure difference
Select Stainless Steel by high temperature condition refer table
Properties at Cryogenic Temperatures of Stainless Steel Tubes
The Effect of carbon on corrosion resistance-304 316 304L 316L
Comparison of grades 316/1.4401 and 316L/1.4404/1.4432 to 316Ti /1.4571
The difference between Stainless Steel Tubing and Cooper Tubing in Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger
Various elements on the performance of stainless steel and the impact and role of organizations
|